Research for Better Hospitality
Staff Satisfaction in Hotels: Why Is Your Team So Quiet? | Blog
How should you listen to your team to understand staff satisfaction in hotels? Discover ways to turn feedback into tangible improvements.
BLOG
Isa Baghirov
9/25/20265 min read


You’re at the morning meeting. The day’s schedule has been discussed, the groups due to arrive have been assessed, and tasks have been allocated to the departments. Before the meeting ends, the manager asks: “Is there anything else you’d like to add?” There is no response from the room. Everyone returns to their work. This silence might lead one to believe that everything is going smoothly. Yet, to understand staff satisfaction in hotels, it is sometimes precisely that silence that needs to be examined.
Of course, there may be no issues to discuss. The team is working harmoniously, tasks are clearly allocated, and any problems are being resolved promptly. However, there is another possibility: employees may have raised the same issue before, failed to achieve any results, and have given up on bringing it up again. Without distinguishing between these two situations, it may be a little too early to say, ‘Our team is satisfied’.
Let’s consider a waiter working in a restaurant. During busy periods, there are problems relaying orders to the kitchen. The waiter mentions this several times. Each time, they are told, ‘Just be a bit more careful.’ Yet the difficulty they are experiencing may stem from glitches in the ordering system or a lack of clarity regarding the division of responsibilities. After a while, they choose not to raise the issue any more. Whilst it may appear to the manager that complaints have decreased, the problem the employee struggles with every evening remains unresolved.
For this reason, the number of feedback comments received from employees does not, on its own, indicate satisfaction. When assessing a reduction in complaints, it is also necessary to consider whether the issues have actually been resolved. Sometimes, an increase in feedback may simply indicate that people are starting to speak up. What matters here is the content of what is being said and how the organisation responds to it.
The hotel manager’s initial reaction is crucial in this regard. When an employee describes a problem, we may be tempted to jump straight into offering an explanation, defending ourselves or trying to identify who is to blame. In that moment, it may be more helpful to pause for a few minutes and try to understand the issue. Asking, ‘When did this last happen, and how did it affect your work?’ makes the conversation more concrete. The employee then finds a space in which to describe the difficulty they are experiencing.
This does not always require lengthy meetings. A brief chat with a housekeeping staff member whilst preparing the trolley can be more illuminating than a general review at a desk. It is easier to see on the ground which supplies are missing, where time is being wasted, or which information is arriving late. A manager’s presence on the floor is valuable when used to understand what staff are actually dealing with.
However, there is a subtle point here. If you ask an employee for their opinion and then spend the rest of the conversation explaining why everything they suggest is not feasible, the discussion will soon become exhausting. Of course, the business has its budget, staffing levels and operational constraints. You can discuss these openly. Nevertheless, you must first listen to the problem in full and then evaluate the options together. Sometimes the solution proposed by the employee is not feasible; however, another solution to the problem they have highlighted may be found.
For example, the staff shuttle’s departure time may not coincide with the end of some employees’ shifts. It may not be possible to arrange a new vehicle straight away. Nevertheless, it is possible to review the route, departure time or shift rota. Behind the employee’s request lies a waiting time they experience every day. Discussing only the cost of the shuttle service without understanding that waiting time overlooks a significant aspect of the issue.
In a hotel seeking to improve staff satisfaction, consideration must also be given to the follow-up on feedback. Who will look into the matter, when will the staff member receive a response, and how will the decision be communicated? When the answers to these questions remain unclear, well-intentioned discussions come to nothing. A clear response, such as ‘We have reviewed the service hours and will be trying out the following arrangement from next week onwards’, demonstrates that the matter discussed is being followed up on.
The same care must be taken with requests that cannot be met. It may not always be possible to fulfil every request. In such situations, explaining the reasons and outlining any alternatives, if available, is a more constructive approach than leaving the employee in a state of uncertainty. Making a promise you cannot keep, however, may make the next conversation more difficult. Clarifying what you can actually do before saying ‘We’ll definitely sort this out’ is a more reliable management practice.
It is also important to pay attention to who is speaking within the team. Hearing the views of the same two people at every meeting does not mean that the whole department has been heard. A new recruit may still be feeling a bit shy. Issues faced by night-shift workers may not come to light in daytime meetings. An employee who does not like speaking in front of a crowd might share a very useful detail in a one-to-one meeting. To reach different people, it is also necessary to vary the format of the meetings.
Employee satisfaction surveys can be helpful here. However, completing the survey is only the start of the process. It is necessary to review the results and share them with the teams, identify areas for improvement, and check what has changed after a while. In particular, if the same complaint recurs, it is useful to check whether the previous decision has been implemented. A change implemented on paper may not have been reflected in day-to-day operations.
In my view, the most valuable aspect of listening to hotel staff is taking their knowledge of the job seriously. There are details that are noticed by the people who set the tables, check the rooms and fulfil guests’ requests every day. When management makes room for these details, it can gain a better understanding of both working conditions and how the service is delivered.
If nobody speaks up at the next meeting, don’t close the agenda straight away. Return to a topic the team has raised previously. Explain what you’ve been doing, where you’ve encountered difficulties, and what will happen next. Then give the floor to others. Perhaps there won’t be a long discussion that day. But at least the staff will see that what they’ve said hasn’t been forgotten by the next meeting.


© 2026 Baghirov Hospitality Research & Insights (BHRI). All Rights Reserved.
Opinions



